In response to the increasing number of individuals experiencing various mental health issues following disasters, the government has been enhancing and providing a system for disaster mental health support. However, throughout the stages of disaster preparedness, response, and recovery, challenges have emerged, such as the duplication of services provided by multiple entities and communication breakdowns at the field level. As a result, there has been a consistent demand for improved collaboration and the establishment of well-defined roles in disaster mental health support. Therefore, this study aims to reflect on the experience of collaboration in disaster mental health support in Korea and identify ways to strengthen collaborative systems for future disaster preparedness and response at the mental health policy level.

The study aims to understand public perceptions of migrants in Korea, attitudes toward immigration policies, and views on migrants’ social rights and the welfare system. In order to do so, a face-to-face survey using structured questionnaires was conducted between June and August 2024, targeting a sample of 3,000 Korean adults aged 19 to 75 across the nation.
The analysis examined public perceptions of diversity and migrant acceptance across dimensions such as cultural openness, stereotypes, and national identity. Additionally, attitudes toward immigration policies and social integration were examined. A subsequent section of the report focuses on public views regarding migrants’ social rights and the welfare system.
The research findings provide valuable insights for enhancing social cohesion. Firstly, public perceptions of migrants should be taken into account when designing and implementing relevant social policies. Secondly, the quality of contact between locals and migrants should be prioritized over the frequency of contact. Thirdly, achieving social consensus on social integration policies and establishing mid-to-long-term policy directions is essential. In this process, the voices of both locals and migrants should be actively included. Fourthly, introducing a social integration fund should be considered. Lastly, an anti-discrimination law should be enacted, along with the establishment of an anti-discrimination committee within relevant ministries or public institutions, with a special rapporteur appointed to oversee these efforts.